CITY OF KANSAS CITY v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 568 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF KANSAS CITY v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 568 (1961) 365 U.S. 568 CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.
No. 657.
Decided March 20, 1961.
192 F. Supp. 179, affirmed.
Joseph P. Jenkins for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox and Roger P. Marquis for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, 365 U.S. 568 (1961) 365 U.S. 568 MILLER v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 719, Misc.
Decided March 20, 1961.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 185 Cal. App. 2d 59, 8 Cal. Rptr. 91.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF KANSAS CITY v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 568 (1961) 365 U.S. 568 CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.
No. 657.
Decided March 20, 1961.
192 F. Supp. 179, affirmed.
Joseph P. Jenkins for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox and Roger P. Marquis for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, 365 U.S. 568 (1961) 365 U.S. 568 MILLER v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 719, Misc.
Decided March 20, 1961.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 185 Cal. App. 2d 59, 8 Cal. Rptr. 91.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Page 365 U.S. 568, 569
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
