YALE TRANSPORT CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 566 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court
YALE TRANSPORT CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 566 (1961)
365 U.S. 566 YALE TRANSPORT CORP. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 584.
Decided March 20, 1961.
185 F. Supp. 96, affirmed.
Herbert Burstein for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kirkpatrick, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Bernard G. Segal, Irving R. Segal and S. Harrison Kahn for United Parcel Service, Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
BURD v. WILKINS, 365 U.S. 566 (1961)
365 U.S. 566 BURD v. WILKINS, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 716, Misc.
Decided March 20, 1961.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
YALE TRANSPORT CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 566 (1961)
365 U.S. 566 YALE TRANSPORT CORP. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 584.
Decided March 20, 1961.
185 F. Supp. 96, affirmed.
Herbert Burstein for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kirkpatrick, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Bernard G. Segal, Irving R. Segal and S. Harrison Kahn for United Parcel Service, Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
BURD v. WILKINS, 365 U.S. 566 (1961)
365 U.S. 566 BURD v. WILKINS, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 716, Misc.
Decided March 20, 1961.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
