DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court
DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627 (1961) 364 U.S. 627 DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 503.
Decided January 9, 1961.
183 F. Supp. 785, affirmed.
Thomas F. Kilroy for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, 364 U.S. 627 (1961) 364 U.S. 627 OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT, INC., v. STEWART ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 521.
Decided January 9, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 223 Ore. 314, 353 P.2d 541.
Ferris F. Boothe for appellant.
Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Alfred B. Thomas and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627 (1961) 364 U.S. 627 DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 503.
Decided January 9, 1961.
183 F. Supp. 785, affirmed.
Thomas F. Kilroy for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, 364 U.S. 627 (1961) 364 U.S. 627 OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT, INC., v. STEWART ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 521.
Decided January 9, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 223 Ore. 314, 353 P.2d 541.
Ferris F. Boothe for appellant.
Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Alfred B. Thomas and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 364 U.S. 627, 628
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.