DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)

364 U.S. 627

DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 503.
Decided January 9, 1961.

183 F. Supp. 785, affirmed.

Thomas F. Kilroy for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/627/case.html">364 U.S. 627</a> (1961) 364 U.S. 627 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)

364 U.S. 627

OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT, INC., v. STEWART ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 521.
Decided January 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 223 Ore. 314, 353 P.2d 541.

Ferris F. Boothe for appellant.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Alfred B. Thomas and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 627, 628




U.S. Supreme Court

DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)

364 U.S. 627

DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 503.
Decided January 9, 1961.

183 F. Supp. 785, affirmed.

Thomas F. Kilroy for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/627/case.html">364 U.S. 627</a> (1961) 364 U.S. 627 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)

364 U.S. 627

OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT, INC., v. STEWART ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 521.
Decided January 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 223 Ore. 314, 353 P.2d 541.

Ferris F. Boothe for appellant.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Alfred B. Thomas and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 627, 628

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.