ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 519 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 519 (1960)
364 U.S. 519 ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 308, Misc.
Decided December 19, 1960.
Appeal dismissed since the judgment below is based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.
Petitioner pro se.
Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Michigan, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.
U.S. Supreme Court
ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 519 (1960)
364 U.S. 519 ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 308, Misc.
Decided December 19, 1960.
Appeal dismissed since the judgment below is based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.
Petitioner pro se.
Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Michigan, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.
Page 364 U.S. 519, 520
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.