ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN,
364 U.S. 519 (1960)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 519 (1960)
364 U.S. 519 ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 308, Misc.
Decided December 19, 1960.
Appeal dismissed since the judgment below is based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.
Petitioner pro se.
Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Michigan, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
