WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING CO. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 518 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING CO. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 518 (1960)
364 U.S. 518 WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 484.
Decided December 19, 1960.
Appeal dismissed.
Reported below: 186 F. Supp. 776.
George B. Turner and Philip H. Strubing for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon and Bernard M. Hollander for the United States, and Bernard G. Segal, Samuel D. Slade, Robert L. Werner and Thomas E. Ervin for Radio Corporation of America and National Broadcasting Co., Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER is of the opinion that the motion to affirm should be granted.
U.S. Supreme Court
WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING CO. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 518 (1960)
364 U.S. 518 WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 484.
Decided December 19, 1960.
Appeal dismissed.
Reported below: 186 F. Supp. 776.
George B. Turner and Philip H. Strubing for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon and Bernard M. Hollander for the United States, and Bernard G. Segal, Samuel D. Slade, Robert L. Werner and Thomas E. Ervin for Radio Corporation of America and National Broadcasting Co., Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER is of the opinion that the motion to affirm should be granted.
Page 364 U.S. 518, 519
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.