ALLRED v. HEATON, 364 U.S. 517 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
ALLRED v. HEATON, 364 U.S. 517 (1960)
364 U.S. 517 ALLRED ET AL. v. HEATON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, TENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 518.
Decided December 19, 1960.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 336 S.W.2d 251.
John M. Barron for appellants.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, Leonard Passmore, First Assistant Attorney General, and John Reeves, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.
U.S. Supreme Court
ALLRED v. HEATON, 364 U.S. 517 (1960)
364 U.S. 517 ALLRED ET AL. v. HEATON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, TENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 518.
Decided December 19, 1960.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 336 S.W.2d 251.
John M. Barron for appellants.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, Leonard Passmore, First Assistant Attorney General, and John Reeves, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.
Page 364 U.S. 517, 518
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
