BECK v. BINKS, 364 U.S. 475 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

BECK v. BINKS, 364 U.S. 475 (1960)

364 U.S. 475

BECK ET AL. v. BINKS, DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND
EDUCATION OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 461.
Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 19 Ill. 2d 72, 165 N. E. 2d 292.

Edwin S. D. Butterfield for appellants.

William L. Guild, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines and Raymond S. Sarnow, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.


KOTRICH v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/475/case.html">364 U.S. 475</a> (1960) 364 U.S. 475 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KOTRICH v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, 364 U.S. 475 (1960)

364 U.S. 475

KOTRICH ET AL. v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 473.
Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 19 Ill. 2d 181, 166 N. E. 2d 601.

Arthur Frankel, Nathan Glick and Lawrence E. Glick for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 475, 476




U.S. Supreme Court

BECK v. BINKS, 364 U.S. 475 (1960)

364 U.S. 475

BECK ET AL. v. BINKS, DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND
EDUCATION OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 461.
Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 19 Ill. 2d 72, 165 N. E. 2d 292.

Edwin S. D. Butterfield for appellants.

William L. Guild, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines and Raymond S. Sarnow, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.


KOTRICH v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/475/case.html">364 U.S. 475</a> (1960) 364 U.S. 475 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KOTRICH v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, 364 U.S. 475 (1960)

364 U.S. 475

KOTRICH ET AL. v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 473.
Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 19 Ill. 2d 181, 166 N. E. 2d 601.

Arthur Frankel, Nathan Glick and Lawrence E. Glick for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 475, 476

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.