DAYTON RUBBER v. CORDOVAN ASSOC., 364 U.S. 299 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

DAYTON RUBBER v. CORDOVAN ASSOC., 364 U.S. 299 (1960)

364 U.S. 299

DAYTON RUBBER CO. v. CORDOVAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 324.
Decided October 24, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 279 F.2d 289.

Philip C. Ebeling and James E. Corkey for petitioner.

Richard W. Galiher for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278, 291.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

Page 364 U.S. 299, 300




U.S. Supreme Court

DAYTON RUBBER v. CORDOVAN ASSOC., 364 U.S. 299 (1960)

364 U.S. 299

DAYTON RUBBER CO. v. CORDOVAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 324.
Decided October 24, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 279 F.2d 289.

Philip C. Ebeling and James E. Corkey for petitioner.

Richard W. Galiher for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278, 291.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

Page 364 U.S. 299, 300

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.