SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP v. SCHEMPP, 364 U.S. 298 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP v. SCHEMPP, 364 U.S. 298 (1960)

364 U.S. 298

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP, PA., ET AL. v. SCHEMPP ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 297.
Decided October 24, 1960.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 177 F. Supp. 398.

C. Brewster Rhoads, Percival R. Rieder and Philip H. Ward III for appellants.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General, for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for such further proceedings as may be appropriate in light of Act No. 700 of the Laws of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, passed at the Session of 1959 and approved by the Governor of the Commonwealth on December 17, 1959.

Page 364 U.S. 298, 299




U.S. Supreme Court

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP v. SCHEMPP, 364 U.S. 298 (1960)

364 U.S. 298

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP, PA., ET AL. v. SCHEMPP ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 297.
Decided October 24, 1960.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 177 F. Supp. 398.

C. Brewster Rhoads, Percival R. Rieder and Philip H. Ward III for appellants.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General, for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for such further proceedings as may be appropriate in light of Act No. 700 of the Laws of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, passed at the Session of 1959 and approved by the Governor of the Commonwealth on December 17, 1959.

Page 364 U.S. 298, 299

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.