COOPER v. PITCHESS, 364 U.S. 294 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

COOPER v. PITCHESS, 364 U.S. 294 (1960)

364 U.S. 294

COOPER ET AL. v. PITCHESS, SHERIFF, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 278.
Decided October 17, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 772, 349 P.2d 956.

Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.

Harold W. Kennedy, William Lamoreaux, William B. McKesson, Ralph F. Bagley and Victor H. Blanch for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BLACK are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 364 U.S. 294, 295




U.S. Supreme Court

COOPER v. PITCHESS, 364 U.S. 294 (1960)

364 U.S. 294

COOPER ET AL. v. PITCHESS, SHERIFF, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 278.
Decided October 17, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 772, 349 P.2d 956.

Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.

Harold W. Kennedy, William Lamoreaux, William B. McKesson, Ralph F. Bagley and Victor H. Blanch for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BLACK are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 364 U.S. 294, 295

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.