COOPER v. PITCHESS, 364 U.S. 294 (1960)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
COOPER v. PITCHESS, 364 U.S. 294 (1960) 364 U.S. 294COOPER ET AL. v. PITCHESS, SHERIFF, LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 278.
Decided October 17, 1960.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 772, 349 P.2d 956.
Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.
Harold W. Kennedy, William Lamoreaux, William B. McKesson, Ralph F. Bagley and Victor H. Blanch for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BLACK are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 278.
Decided October 17, 1960.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 772, 349 P.2d 956. Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for appellants. Harold W. Kennedy, William Lamoreaux, William B. McKesson, Ralph F. Bagley and Victor H. Blanch for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BLACK are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 364 U.S. 294, 295
U.S. Supreme Court
COOPER v. PITCHESS, 364 U.S. 294 (1960) 364 U.S. 294 COOPER ET AL. v. PITCHESS, SHERIFF, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 278.
Decided October 17, 1960.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 772, 349 P.2d 956. Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for appellants. Harold W. Kennedy, William Lamoreaux, William B. McKesson, Ralph F. Bagley and Victor H. Blanch for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BLACK are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 364 U.S. 294, 295
Search This Case
