CLINTON v. JOSHUA HENDY CORP., 364 U.S. 292 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
CLINTON v. JOSHUA HENDY CORP., 364 U.S. 292 (1960) 364 U.S. 292 CLINTON v. JOSHUA HENDY CORP.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 59, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.
Reported below: 277 F.2d 447.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 364 U.S. 292 (1960) 364 U.S. 292 CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 98, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
WACHTEL v. NEW YORK, 364 U.S. 292 (1960) 364 U.S. 292 WACHTEL v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK,
SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 144, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
CLINTON v. JOSHUA HENDY CORP., 364 U.S. 292 (1960) 364 U.S. 292 CLINTON v. JOSHUA HENDY CORP.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 59, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.
Reported below: 277 F.2d 447.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 364 U.S. 292 (1960) 364 U.S. 292 CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 98, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
WACHTEL v. NEW YORK, 364 U.S. 292 (1960) 364 U.S. 292 WACHTEL v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK,
SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 144, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 364 U.S. 292, 293
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
