FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, 364 U.S. 291 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, 364 U.S. 291 (1960) 364 U.S. 291 FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 255.
Decided October 10, 1960.
184 F. Supp. 129, affirmed.
Jacob Kossman for appellant.
Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
VAUGHN v. OHIO, 364 U.S. 291 (1960) 364 U.S. 291 VAUGHN v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 24, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 360, 164 N.E.2d 739.
Appellant pro se.
C. Watson Hover and Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, 364 U.S. 291 (1960) 364 U.S. 291 FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 255.
Decided October 10, 1960.
184 F. Supp. 129, affirmed.
Jacob Kossman for appellant.
Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
VAUGHN v. OHIO, 364 U.S. 291 (1960) 364 U.S. 291 VAUGHN v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 24, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 360, 164 N.E.2d 739.
Appellant pro se.
C. Watson Hover and Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Page 364 U.S. 291, 292
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.