FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, 364 U.S. 291 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, 364 U.S. 291 (1960) 364 U.S. 291

FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 255.
Decided October 10, 1960.

184 F. Supp. 129, affirmed.

Jacob Kossman for appellant.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

VAUGHN v. OHIO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/291/">364 U.S. 291</a> (1960) 364 U.S. 291 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

VAUGHN v. OHIO, 364 U.S. 291 (1960) 364 U.S. 291

VAUGHN v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 24, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 360, 164 N.E.2d 739.

Appellant pro se.

C. Watson Hover and Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 364 U.S. 291, 292

 


U.S. Supreme Court

FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, 364 U.S. 291 (1960) 364 U.S. 291

FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 255.
Decided October 10, 1960.

184 F. Supp. 129, affirmed.

Jacob Kossman for appellant.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

VAUGHN v. OHIO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/291/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/364/291/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/364/291/">364 U.S. 291</a></a></a> (1960) 364 U.S. 291 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

VAUGHN v. OHIO, 364 U.S. 291 (1960) 364 U.S. 291

VAUGHN v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 24, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 360, 164 N.E.2d 739.

Appellant pro se.

C. Watson Hover and Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 364 U.S. 291, 292

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.