DUNSCOMBE v. SAYLE, 364 U.S. 289 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

DUNSCOMBE v. SAYLE, 364 U.S. 289 (1960) 364 U.S. 289

DUNSCOMBE v. SAYLE, ADMINISTRATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 163.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

John Wattawa for appellant.

C. Robert Burns for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

STATE TAX COMM. OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY CO. OF TEXAS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/289/case.html">364 U.S. 289</a> (1960) 364 U.S. 289 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STATE TAX COMM. OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY CO. OF TEXAS, 364 U.S. 289 (1960) 364 U.S. 289

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY COMPANY OF TEXAS, INC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 168.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded for clarification.

Reported below: 87 Ariz. 268, 350 P.2d 674.

Wade Church, Attorney General of Arizona, Leslie C. Hardy, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Stanley Z. Goodfarb, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.

Denison Kitchel for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for clarification. Minnesota v. National Tea Co., 309 U.S. 551.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

Page 364 U.S. 289, 290

 


U.S. Supreme Court

DUNSCOMBE v. SAYLE, 364 U.S. 289 (1960) 364 U.S. 289

DUNSCOMBE v. SAYLE, ADMINISTRATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 163.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

John Wattawa for appellant.

C. Robert Burns for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

STATE TAX COMM. OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY CO. OF TEXAS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/289/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/364/289/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/364/289/">364 U.S. 289</a></a></a> (1960) 364 U.S. 289 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STATE TAX COMM. OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY CO. OF TEXAS, 364 U.S. 289 (1960) 364 U.S. 289

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY COMPANY OF TEXAS, INC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 168.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded for clarification.

Reported below: 87 Ariz. 268, 350 P.2d 674.

Wade Church, Attorney General of Arizona, Leslie C. Hardy, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Stanley Z. Goodfarb, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.

Denison Kitchel for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for clarification. Minnesota v. National Tea Co., 309 U.S. 551.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

Page 364 U.S. 289, 290

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.