THOMAS v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 286 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
THOMAS v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 286 (1960) 364 U.S. 286 THOMAS ET AL. v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE RECORDER'S COURT OF THE CITY OF DETROIT.
No. 98.
Decided October 10, 1960.
Appeal dismissed.
Harold Norris and H. Franklin Brown for appellants.
Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
KOPPERS COMPANY INC. v. PENNSYLVANIA, 364 U.S. 286 (1960) 364 U.S. 286 KOPPERS COMPANY, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 100.
Decided October 10, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 397 Pa. 523, 156 A.2d 328.
Roy J. Keefer for appellant.
Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and George W. Keitel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
THOMAS v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 286 (1960) 364 U.S. 286 THOMAS ET AL. v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE RECORDER'S COURT OF THE CITY OF DETROIT.
No. 98.
Decided October 10, 1960.
Appeal dismissed.
Harold Norris and H. Franklin Brown for appellants.
Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
KOPPERS COMPANY INC. v. PENNSYLVANIA, 364 U.S. 286 (1960) 364 U.S. 286 KOPPERS COMPANY, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 100.
Decided October 10, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 397 Pa. 523, 156 A.2d 328.
Roy J. Keefer for appellant.
Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and George W. Keitel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 364 U.S. 286, 287
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.