CAMARA v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 283 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

CAMARA v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 283 (1960)

364 U.S. 283

CAMARA v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 605, Misc.
Decided June 27, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 271 F.2d 787.

Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 206, decided this day.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER dissents on the basis of his dissenting opinion in Rios v. United States, ante, p. 233, and Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 233, decided this day.


CUTTING v. BANK OF ALASKA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/283/case.html">364 U.S. 283</a> (1960) 364 U.S. 283 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CUTTING v. BANK OF ALASKA, 364 U.S. 283 (1960)

364 U.S. 283

CUTTING v. BANK OF ALASKA (OR NATIONAL BANK OF ALASKA) ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 925, Misc.
Decided June 27, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and motions for other relief denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. The motions for other relief are denied.

Page 364 U.S. 283, 284




U.S. Supreme Court

CAMARA v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 283 (1960)

364 U.S. 283

CAMARA v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 605, Misc.
Decided June 27, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 271 F.2d 787.

Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 206, decided this day.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER dissents on the basis of his dissenting opinion in Rios v. United States, ante, p. 233, and Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 233, decided this day.


CUTTING v. BANK OF ALASKA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/364/283/case.html">364 U.S. 283</a> (1960) 364 U.S. 283 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CUTTING v. BANK OF ALASKA, 364 U.S. 283 (1960)

364 U.S. 283

CUTTING v. BANK OF ALASKA (OR NATIONAL BANK OF ALASKA) ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 925, Misc.
Decided June 27, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and motions for other relief denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. The motions for other relief are denied.

Page 364 U.S. 283, 284

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.