UNITED RAILROAD WORKERS DIV. v. BALTIMORE & OHIO R., 364 U.S. 278 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED RAILROAD WORKERS DIV. v. BALTIMORE & OHIO R., 364 U.S. 278 (1960)

364 U.S. 278

UNITED RAILROAD WORKERS DIVISION OF TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA ET
AL. v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 535.
Decided June 27, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 271 F.2d 87.

George Halpern, Edith Lowenstein, Carl E. Newton, Yelverton Cowherd and Alfred D. Treherne for petitioners.

Joseph P. Allen for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co., 363 U.S. 528.

Page 364 U.S. 278, 279




U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED RAILROAD WORKERS DIV. v. BALTIMORE & OHIO R., 364 U.S. 278 (1960)

364 U.S. 278

UNITED RAILROAD WORKERS DIVISION OF TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA ET
AL. v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 535.
Decided June 27, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 271 F.2d 87.

George Halpern, Edith Lowenstein, Carl E. Newton, Yelverton Cowherd and Alfred D. Treherne for petitioners.

Joseph P. Allen for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co., 363 U.S. 528.

Page 364 U.S. 278, 279

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.