AMERICAN LEGION POST NO. 51 v. PENNSYLVANIA, 363 U.S. 720 (1960)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

AMERICAN LEGION POST NO. 51 v. PENNSYLVANIA, 363 U.S. 720 (1960)

363 U.S. 720

AMERICAN LEGION POST NO. 51 v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 881.
Decided June 20, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Reported below: 397 Pa. 430, 156 A. 2d 107.

Anthony Cavalcante for appellant.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Page 363 U.S. 720, 721




U.S. Supreme Court

AMERICAN LEGION POST NO. 51 v. PENNSYLVANIA, 363 U.S. 720 (1960)

363 U.S. 720

AMERICAN LEGION POST NO. 51 v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 881.
Decided June 20, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Reported below: 397 Pa. 430, 156 A. 2d 107.

Anthony Cavalcante for appellant.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Page 363 U.S. 720, 721

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.