BERNSTEIN v. REAL ESTATE COMM'N, 363 U.S. 419 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

BERNSTEIN v. REAL ESTATE COMM'N, 363 U.S. 419 (1960)

363 U.S. 419

BERNSTEIN ET AL. v. REAL ESTATE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 852.
Decided June 13, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 221 Md. 221, 156 A. 2d 657.

J. Calvin Carney and William H. Murphy for appellants.

C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Commission.

Melvin J. Sykes for appellees Allendale-Lyndhurst Improvement Assn., Inc., Allen Kleiman et ux. and Bernard Cherry et ux.; and David Kimmelman of counsel for appellees Kleiman and Cherry.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 363 U.S. 419, 420




U.S. Supreme Court

BERNSTEIN v. REAL ESTATE COMM'N, 363 U.S. 419 (1960)

363 U.S. 419

BERNSTEIN ET AL. v. REAL ESTATE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 852.
Decided June 13, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 221 Md. 221, 156 A. 2d 657.

J. Calvin Carney and William H. Murphy for appellants.

C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Commission.

Melvin J. Sykes for appellees Allendale-Lyndhurst Improvement Assn., Inc., Allen Kleiman et ux. and Bernard Cherry et ux.; and David Kimmelman of counsel for appellees Kleiman and Cherry.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 363 U.S. 419, 420

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.