LEVITT & SONS INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 363 U.S. 418 (1960)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

LEVITT & SONS INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 363 U.S. 418 (1960) 363 U.S. 418

LEVITT & SONS, INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION IN STATE DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 865.
Decided June 13, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 31 N. J. 514, 158 A.2d 177.

William P. Reiss for appellant.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Lee A. Holley, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee Division Against Discrimination.

Emerson L. Darnell and Sidney Reitman for appellee Willie R. James; Jerome C. Eisenberg and Herbert H. Tate for appellee Franklin D. Todd; and Julius Wildstein of counsel, and Joseph B. Robinson on the brief, for both individual appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK would note probable jurisdiction.

Page 363 U.S. 418, 419

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

LEVITT & SONS INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 363 U.S. 418 (1960) 363 U.S. 418 LEVITT & SONS, INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION IN STATE DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 865.
Decided June 13, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 31 N. J. 514, 158 A.2d 177.

William P. Reiss for appellant.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Lee A. Holley, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee Division Against Discrimination.

Emerson L. Darnell and Sidney Reitman for appellee Willie R. James; Jerome C. Eisenberg and Herbert H. Tate for appellee Franklin D. Todd; and Julius Wildstein of counsel, and Joseph B. Robinson on the brief, for both individual appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK would note probable jurisdiction.

Page 363 U.S. 418, 419