LEVITT & SONS INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 363 U.S. 418 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

LEVITT & SONS INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 363 U.S. 418 (1960)

363 U.S. 418

LEVITT & SONS, INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION IN STATE DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 865.
Decided June 13, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 31 N. J. 514, 158 A. 2d 177.

William P. Reiss for appellant.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Lee A. Holley, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee Division Against Discrimination.

Emerson L. Darnell and Sidney Reitman for appellee Willie R. James; Jerome C. Eisenberg and Herbert H. Tate for appellee Franklin D. Todd; and Julius Wildstein of counsel, and Joseph B. Robinson on the brief, for both individual appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK would note probable jurisdiction.

Page 363 U.S. 418, 419




U.S. Supreme Court

LEVITT & SONS INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 363 U.S. 418 (1960)

363 U.S. 418

LEVITT & SONS, INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION IN STATE DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 865.
Decided June 13, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 31 N. J. 514, 158 A. 2d 177.

William P. Reiss for appellant.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Lee A. Holley, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee Division Against Discrimination.

Emerson L. Darnell and Sidney Reitman for appellee Willie R. James; Jerome C. Eisenberg and Herbert H. Tate for appellee Franklin D. Todd; and Julius Wildstein of counsel, and Joseph B. Robinson on the brief, for both individual appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK would note probable jurisdiction.

Page 363 U.S. 418, 419

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.