HELM v. ARIZONA, 362 U.S. 609 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
HELM v. ARIZONA, 362 U.S. 609 (1960)
362 U.S. 609 HELM ET AL. v. ARIZONA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 768.
Decided May 16, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 86 Ariz. 275, 345 P.2d 202.
Irving A. Jennings for appellants.
Wade Church, Attorney General of Arizona, Leslie C. Hardy, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Jay Dushoff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
HELM v. ARIZONA, 362 U.S. 609 (1960)
362 U.S. 609 HELM ET AL. v. ARIZONA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 768.
Decided May 16, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 86 Ariz. 275, 345 P.2d 202.
Irving A. Jennings for appellants.
Wade Church, Attorney General of Arizona, Leslie C. Hardy, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Jay Dushoff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 362 U.S. 609, 610
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.