YANCY v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 389 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

YANCY v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 389 (1960)

362 U.S. 389

YANCY v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 47.
Argued December 8-9, 1959.
Decided April 18, 1960.

252 F.2d 554, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Seymour B. Goldman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

John L. Murphy argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Robert S. Erdahl and J. F. Bishop.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 362 U.S. 389, 390




U.S. Supreme Court

YANCY v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 389 (1960)

362 U.S. 389

YANCY v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 47.
Argued December 8-9, 1959.
Decided April 18, 1960.

252 F.2d 554, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Seymour B. Goldman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

John L. Murphy argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Robert S. Erdahl and J. F. Bishop.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 362 U.S. 389, 390

Oral Argument - December 08, 1959
Oral Argument - December 09, 1959
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.