YANCY v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 389 (1960)
Argued:
December 8, 1959
Argued:
December 9, 1959
Decided:
April 18, 1960
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
YANCY v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 389 (1960) 362 U.S. 389YANCY v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH
CIRCUIT.
No. 47.
Argued December 8-9, 1959.
Decided April 18, 1960.
252 F.2d 554, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Seymour B. Goldman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
John L. Murphy argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Robert S. Erdahl and J. F. Bishop.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 47.
Argued December 8-9, 1959.
Decided April 18, 1960.
252 F.2d 554, affirmed by an equally divided Court. Seymour B. Goldman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. John L. Murphy argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Robert S. Erdahl and J. F. Bishop. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 362 U.S. 389, 390
U.S. Supreme Court
YANCY v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 389 (1960) 362 U.S. 389 YANCY v. UNITED STATES.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 47.
Argued December 8-9, 1959.
Decided April 18, 1960.
252 F.2d 554, affirmed by an equally divided Court. Seymour B. Goldman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. John L. Murphy argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Robert S. Erdahl and J. F. Bishop. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 362 U.S. 389, 390
Search This Case
