RUBBER WORKERS v. LABOR BOARD, 362 U.S. 329 (1960)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

RUBBER WORKERS v. LABOR BOARD, 362 U.S. 329 (1960)

362 U.S. 329

UNITED RUBBER, CORK, LINOLEUM & PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL.
v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 316.
Decided April 4, 1960.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 269 F.2d 694.

Garnet L. Patterson and Arthur J. Goldberg for petitioners.

Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is reversed. National Labor Relations Board v. Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union No. 639, ante, p. 274.

Page 362 U.S. 329, 330




U.S. Supreme Court

RUBBER WORKERS v. LABOR BOARD, 362 U.S. 329 (1960)

362 U.S. 329

UNITED RUBBER, CORK, LINOLEUM & PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL.
v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 316.
Decided April 4, 1960.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 269 F.2d 694.

Garnet L. Patterson and Arthur J. Goldberg for petitioners.

Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is reversed. National Labor Relations Board v. Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union No. 639, ante, p. 274.

Page 362 U.S. 329, 330

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.