TILGHMAN v. CULVER, 362 U.S. 308 (1960)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

TILGHMAN v. CULVER, 362 U.S. 308 (1960)

362 U.S. 308

TILGHMAN v. CULVER, PRISON CUSTODIAN.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.
No. 135, Misc.
Decided March 28, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: ___ So.2d ___.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Reeves Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. In view of the representations of the Attorney General of Florida that the cause has become moot, the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the cause is remanded for such further proceedings as that Court may deem appropriate. See N. A. A. C. P. v. Committee on Offenses Against the Administration of Justice, 358 U.S. 40.

Page 362 U.S. 308, 309




U.S. Supreme Court

TILGHMAN v. CULVER, 362 U.S. 308 (1960)

362 U.S. 308

TILGHMAN v. CULVER, PRISON CUSTODIAN.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.
No. 135, Misc.
Decided March 28, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: ___ So.2d ___.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Reeves Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. In view of the representations of the Attorney General of Florida that the cause has become moot, the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the cause is remanded for such further proceedings as that Court may deem appropriate. See N. A. A. C. P. v. Committee on Offenses Against the Administration of Justice, 358 U.S. 40.

Page 362 U.S. 308, 309

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.