CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, KY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, KY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960)

362 U.S. 215

CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMM'N OF KENTUCKY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 628.
Decided March 21, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 327 S. W. 2d 954.

Charles S. Rhyne and S. White Rhyne, Jr. for appellant.

Jerome M. Alper for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SMITH v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/362/215/case.html">362 U.S. 215</a> (1960) 362 U.S. 215 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960)

362 U.S. 215

SMITH ET AL. v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREGON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 645.
Decided March 21, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 216 Ore. 662, 341 P.2d 540.

Robert T. Mautz for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Carlisle B. Roberts and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 362 U.S. 215, 216




U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, KY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960)

362 U.S. 215

CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMM'N OF KENTUCKY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 628.
Decided March 21, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 327 S. W. 2d 954.

Charles S. Rhyne and S. White Rhyne, Jr. for appellant.

Jerome M. Alper for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SMITH v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/362/215/case.html">362 U.S. 215</a> (1960) 362 U.S. 215 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960)

362 U.S. 215

SMITH ET AL. v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREGON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 645.
Decided March 21, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 216 Ore. 662, 341 P.2d 540.

Robert T. Mautz for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Carlisle B. Roberts and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 362 U.S. 215, 216

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.