CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, KY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, KY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960) 362 U.S. 215CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY, v. PUBLIC
SERVICE COMM'N OF KENTUCKY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 628.
Decided March 21, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 327 S.W.2d 954.
Charles S. Rhyne and S. White Rhyne, Jr. for appellant.
Jerome M. Alper for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
362 U.S. 215 (1960) 362 U.S. 215 (1960) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960) 362 U.S. 215SMITH ET AL. v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREGON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 645.
Decided March 21, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 216 Ore. 662, 341 P.2d 540.
Robert T. Mautz for appellants.
Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Carlisle B. Roberts and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, KY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960) 362 U.S. 215 CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMM'N OF KENTUCKY ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 628.
Decided March 21, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 327 S.W.2d 954. Charles S. Rhyne and S. White Rhyne, Jr. for appellant. Jerome M. Alper for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
362 U.S. 215 (1960) 362 U.S. 215 (1960) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960) 362 U.S. 215 SMITH ET AL. v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREGON, ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 645.
Decided March 21, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 216 Ore. 662, 341 P.2d 540. Robert T. Mautz for appellants. Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Carlisle B. Roberts and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 362 U.S. 215, 216