CORSO v. SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, 362 U.S. 144 (1960)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
CORSO v. SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, 362 U.S. 144 (1960) 362 U.S. 144CORSO v. SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK
OF LOS ANGELES, EXECUTOR.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND
APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 652.
Decided March 7, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 171 Cal. App. 2d 816, 342 P.2d 56.
Appellant pro se.
Henry F. Walker for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 652.
Decided March 7, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 171 Cal. App. 2d 816, 342 P.2d 56. Appellant pro se. Henry F. Walker for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 362 U.S. 144, 145
U.S. Supreme Court
CORSO v. SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, 362 U.S. 144 (1960) 362 U.S. 144 CORSO v. SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, EXECUTOR.APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 652.
Decided March 7, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 171 Cal. App. 2d 816, 342 P.2d 56. Appellant pro se. Henry F. Walker for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 362 U.S. 144, 145
Search This Case
