CORSO v. SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, 362 U.S. 144 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
CORSO v. SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, 362 U.S. 144 (1960)
362 U.S. 144 CORSO v. SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, EXECUTOR.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 652.
Decided March 7, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 171 Cal. App. 2d 816, 342 P.2d 56.
Appellant pro se.
Henry F. Walker for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
CORSO v. SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, 362 U.S. 144 (1960)
362 U.S. 144 CORSO v. SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES, EXECUTOR.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 652.
Decided March 7, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 171 Cal. App. 2d 816, 342 P.2d 56.
Appellant pro se.
Henry F. Walker for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Page 362 U.S. 144, 145
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.