COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE U.S. v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES, 361 U.S. 951 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE U.S. v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES , 361 U.S. 951 (1960)
361 U.S. 951
COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES of America, petitioner,
v.
SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD.
No. 537.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 5, 1960
Messrs. John J. Abt and Joseph Forer, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Messrs. Kevin T. Maroney, George B. Searls and Frank R. Hunter, Jr., for respondent.
Motion for leave to use as part of the record the printed record heretofore filed with this Court in No. 48, October Term, 1955, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted.
Granted.[ Communist Party of the U.S. v. Subversive Activities 361 U.S. 951 (1960) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE U.S. v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES , 361 U.S. 951 (1960)
COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES of America, petitioner,
v.
SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD.
No. 537.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 5, 1960
Messrs. John J. Abt and Joseph Forer, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Messrs. Kevin T. Maroney, George B. Searls and Frank R. Hunter, Jr., for respondent.
Motion for leave to use as part of the record the printed record heretofore filed with this Court in No. 48, October Term, 1955, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted.
Granted.[ Communist Party of the U.S. v. Subversive Activities 361 U.S. 951 (1960) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.