COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE U.S. v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES, 361 U.S. 951 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE U.S. v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES , 361 U.S. 951 (1960)

361 U.S. 951

COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES of America, petitioner,
v.
SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD.
No. 537.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 5, 1960

Messrs. John J. Abt and Joseph Forer, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Messrs. Kevin T. Maroney, George B. Searls and Frank R. Hunter, Jr., for respondent.

Motion for leave to use as part of the record the printed record heretofore filed with this Court in No. 48, October Term, 1955, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted.

Granted.[ Communist Party of the U.S. v. Subversive Activities 361 U.S. 951 (1960) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE U.S. v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES , 361 U.S. 951 (1960)

 361 U.S. 951

COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES of America, petitioner,
v.
SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD.
No. 537.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 5, 1960

Messrs. John J. Abt and Joseph Forer, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Messrs. Kevin T. Maroney, George B. Searls and Frank R. Hunter, Jr., for respondent.

Motion for leave to use as part of the record the printed record heretofore filed with this Court in No. 48, October Term, 1955, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted.

Granted.[ Communist Party of the U.S. v. Subversive Activities 361 U.S. 951 (1960) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.