SUPERIOR COURT v. YELLOW CAB, 361 U.S. 373 (1960)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SUPERIOR COURT v. YELLOW CAB, 361 U.S. 373 (1960)

361 U.S. 373

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY ET AL. v. WASHINGTON EX REL.
YELLOW CAB SERVICE, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 76.
Argued January 20, 1960.
Decided January 25, 1960.

53 Wash. 2d 644, 333 P.2d 924, reversed.

Richard P. Donaldson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Samuel B. Bassett.

Kenneth A. Cox argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Herbert S. Little and Warren R. Slemmons.

Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Florian J. Bartosic filed a brief for the National Labor Relations Board, as amicus curiae, in support of petitioners.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236.

Page 361 U.S. 373, 374




U.S. Supreme Court

SUPERIOR COURT v. YELLOW CAB, 361 U.S. 373 (1960)

361 U.S. 373

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY ET AL. v. WASHINGTON EX REL.
YELLOW CAB SERVICE, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 76.
Argued January 20, 1960.
Decided January 25, 1960.

53 Wash. 2d 644, 333 P.2d 924, reversed.

Richard P. Donaldson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Samuel B. Bassett.

Kenneth A. Cox argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Herbert S. Little and Warren R. Slemmons.

Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Florian J. Bartosic filed a brief for the National Labor Relations Board, as amicus curiae, in support of petitioners.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236.

Page 361 U.S. 373, 374

Oral Argument - January 20, 1960
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.