KANSAS CORP. COMM'N v. ARROW CO., 361 U.S. 353 (1960)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

KANSAS CORP. COMM'N v. ARROW CO., 361 U.S. 353 (1960)

361 U.S. 353

STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS ET AL. v. ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO.
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

ALABAMA.

 No. 526.
Decided January 18, 1960.*

 176 F. Supp. 411, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 527, Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. et al. v. Arrow Transportation Co. et al., and No. 528, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Arrow Transportation Co. et al., also on appeals from the same Court.

Byron M. Gray for appellants in No. 526.

R. W. Henriott and M. L. Cassell for appellants in No. 527.

Robert W. Ginnane and Isaac K. Hay for appellant in No. 528.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, Donald Macleay, George Shuff, John A. Caddell and Charles J. McCarthy for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 361 U.S. 353, 354

 


U.S. Supreme Court

KANSAS CORP. COMM'N v. ARROW CO., 361 U.S. 353 (1960)

361 U.S. 353

STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS ET AL. v. ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO.
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

ALABAMA.

 No. 526.
Decided January 18, 1960.*

 176 F. Supp. 411, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 527, Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. et al. v. Arrow Transportation Co. et al., and No. 528, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Arrow Transportation Co. et al., also on appeals from the same Court.

Byron M. Gray for appellants in No. 526.

R. W. Henriott and M. L. Cassell for appellants in No. 527.

Robert W. Ginnane and Isaac K. Hay for appellant in No. 528.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, Donald Macleay, George Shuff, John A. Caddell and Charles J. McCarthy for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 361 U.S. 353, 354

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.