MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSN. v. SMITH, 361 U.S. 31 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSN. v. SMITH, 361 U.S. 31 (1959)

361 U.S. 31

MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. v. SMITH, AUDITOR OF
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 288.
Decided October 19, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 16 Ill. 2d 116, 156 N. E. 2d 587.

C. Severin Buschmann and Roy P. Hull for appellants.

Grenville Beardsley, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and A. Zola Groves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 31, 32




U.S. Supreme Court

MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSN. v. SMITH, 361 U.S. 31 (1959)

361 U.S. 31

MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. v. SMITH, AUDITOR OF
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 288.
Decided October 19, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 16 Ill. 2d 116, 156 N. E. 2d 587.

C. Severin Buschmann and Roy P. Hull for appellants.

Grenville Beardsley, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and A. Zola Groves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 31, 32

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.