MITCHELL v. OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO., 361 U.S. 231 (1960)

U.S. Supreme Court

MITCHELL v. OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO., 361 U.S. 231 (1960)

361 U.S. 231

MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, v. OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 33.
Argued November 17, 1959.
Decided January 11, 1960.

In view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Reported below: 254 F.2d 116.

Bessie Margolin argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Wayne G. Barnett, Harold C. Nystrom and Sylvia S. Ellison.

Martin P. Gallagher argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Orval Yokom.

Edward Brown Williams filed a brief for the National Association of Frozen Food Packers, as amicus curiae, in support of respondents.

PER CURIAM.

In view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues sought to be tendered, made apparent in oral argument and the memoranda of counsel subsequently filed at the Court's request, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 361 U.S. 231, 232




U.S. Supreme Court

MITCHELL v. OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO., 361 U.S. 231 (1960)

361 U.S. 231

MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, v. OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 33.
Argued November 17, 1959.
Decided January 11, 1960.

In view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Reported below: 254 F.2d 116.

Bessie Margolin argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Wayne G. Barnett, Harold C. Nystrom and Sylvia S. Ellison.

Martin P. Gallagher argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Orval Yokom.

Edward Brown Williams filed a brief for the National Association of Frozen Food Packers, as amicus curiae, in support of respondents.

PER CURIAM.

In view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues sought to be tendered, made apparent in oral argument and the memoranda of counsel subsequently filed at the Court's request, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 361 U.S. 231, 232

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.