FAUBUS, v. AARON, 361 U.S. 197 (1959)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

FAUBUS, v. AARON, 361 U.S. 197 (1959)

361 U.S. 197

FAUBUS, GOVERNOR OF ARKANSAS, v. AARON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
ARKANSAS. No. 458.
Decided December 14, 1959.*

173 F. Supp. 944, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 471, State Board of Education et al. v. Aaron et al., also on appeal from the same Court.

Thomas Harper and Walter L. Pope for appellant in No. 458.

Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Ben J. Harrison, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellants in No. 471.

Wiley A. Branton and Thurgood Marshall for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER would note probable jurisdiction.

Page 361 U.S. 197, 198




U.S. Supreme Court

FAUBUS, v. AARON, 361 U.S. 197 (1959)

361 U.S. 197

FAUBUS, GOVERNOR OF ARKANSAS, v. AARON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
ARKANSAS. No. 458.
Decided December 14, 1959.*

173 F. Supp. 944, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 471, State Board of Education et al. v. Aaron et al., also on appeal from the same Court.

Thomas Harper and Walter L. Pope for appellant in No. 458.

Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Ben J. Harrison, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellants in No. 471.

Wiley A. Branton and Thurgood Marshall for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER would note probable jurisdiction.

Page 361 U.S. 197, 198

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.