SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS GIANT SUPER MARKETS v. McCRORY, 361 U.S. 114 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS GIANT SUPER MARKETS v. McCRORY, 361 U.S. 114 (1959)

361 U.S. 114

SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS GIANT SUPER MARKETS v. McCRORY, COMMISSIONER OF
AGRICULTURE AND IMMIGRATION OF LOUISIANA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. No. 423.
Decided November 23, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 237 La. 768, 112 So.2d 606.

Saul Stone and Paul O. H. Pigman for appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, George M. Ponder, First Assistant Attorney General, and N. Cleburn Dalton, Special Assistant Attorney General, for McCrory, and Frank H. Peterman, for Blu-Ribon Dairies, Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 114, 115




U.S. Supreme Court

SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS GIANT SUPER MARKETS v. McCRORY, 361 U.S. 114 (1959)

361 U.S. 114

SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS GIANT SUPER MARKETS v. McCRORY, COMMISSIONER OF
AGRICULTURE AND IMMIGRATION OF LOUISIANA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. No. 423.
Decided November 23, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 237 La. 768, 112 So.2d 606.

Saul Stone and Paul O. H. Pigman for appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, George M. Ponder, First Assistant Attorney General, and N. Cleburn Dalton, Special Assistant Attorney General, for McCrory, and Frank H. Peterman, for Blu-Ribon Dairies, Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 114, 115

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.