HERSHEY MFG. CO. v. ADAMOWSKI, 360 U.S. 717 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court
HERSHEY MFG. CO. v. ADAMOWSKI, 360 U.S. 717 (1959) 360 U.S. 717 HERSHEY MFG. CO. v. ADAMOWSKI ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 944.
Decided June 29, 1959.
Judgment affirmed.
Maurice J. Walsh, John J. Yowell and G. Kent Yowell for appellant.
Benjamin S. Adamowski for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed. Although the District Court had jurisdiction, Doud v. Hodge, 350 U.S. 485, we accept its finding that there was no showing of irreparable injury.
U.S. Supreme Court
DeGREGORY v. WYMAN, 360 U.S. 717 (1959) 360 U.S. 717 DeGREGORY v. WYMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
No. 7, Misc.
Decided June 29, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Appellant pro se.
Louis C. Wyman, Attorney General of New Hampshire, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would note probable jurisdiction.
U.S. Supreme Court
HERSHEY MFG. CO. v. ADAMOWSKI, 360 U.S. 717 (1959) 360 U.S. 717 HERSHEY MFG. CO. v. ADAMOWSKI ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 944.
Decided June 29, 1959.
Judgment affirmed.
Maurice J. Walsh, John J. Yowell and G. Kent Yowell for appellant.
Benjamin S. Adamowski for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed. Although the District Court had jurisdiction, Doud v. Hodge, 350 U.S. 485, we accept its finding that there was no showing of irreparable injury.
U.S. Supreme Court
DeGREGORY v. WYMAN, 360 U.S. 717 (1959) 360 U.S. 717 DeGREGORY v. WYMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
No. 7, Misc.
Decided June 29, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Appellant pro se.
Louis C. Wyman, Attorney General of New Hampshire, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would note probable jurisdiction.
Page 360 U.S. 717, 1
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
