LEV v. UNITED STATES, 360 U.S. 470 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

LEV v. UNITED STATES, 360 U.S. 470 (1959)

360 U.S. 470

LEV v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 435.
Argued April 27-28, 1959.
Decided June 22, 1959.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 436, Wool v. United States, and No. 437, Rubin v. United States, also on certiorari to the same Court.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Reported below: 258 F.2d 9.

Anthony Bradley Eben argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 435.

Albert H. Treiman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 436.

John T. Sullivan argued the cause for petitioner in No. 437. On the brief was Isidor Enselman.

Oscar H. Davis argued the causes for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg, Julia P. Cooper and Jerome M. Feit.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 360 U.S. 470, 471




U.S. Supreme Court

LEV v. UNITED STATES, 360 U.S. 470 (1959)

360 U.S. 470

LEV v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 435.
Argued April 27-28, 1959.
Decided June 22, 1959.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 436, Wool v. United States, and No. 437, Rubin v. United States, also on certiorari to the same Court.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Reported below: 258 F.2d 9.

Anthony Bradley Eben argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 435.

Albert H. Treiman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 436.

John T. Sullivan argued the cause for petitioner in No. 437. On the brief was Isidor Enselman.

Oscar H. Davis argued the causes for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg, Julia P. Cooper and Jerome M. Feit.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 360 U.S. 470, 471

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.