PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA, 360 U.S. 314 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA, 360 U.S. 314 (1959)

360 U.S. 314

PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 830.
Decided June 15, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 51 Cal. 2d 177, 331 P.2d 24.

Marvin E. Lewis for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, Dion Holm and George Baglin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ORTEGA v. BIBB, <a href="/cases/federal/us/360/314/case.html">360 U.S. 314</a> (1959) 360 U.S. 314 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ORTEGA v. BIBB, 360 U.S. 314 (1959)

360 U.S. 314

ORTEGA v. BIBB, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 790, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1959.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 360 U.S. 314, 315




U.S. Supreme Court

PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA, 360 U.S. 314 (1959)

360 U.S. 314

PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 830.
Decided June 15, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 51 Cal. 2d 177, 331 P.2d 24.

Marvin E. Lewis for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, Dion Holm and George Baglin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ORTEGA v. BIBB, <a href="/cases/federal/us/360/314/case.html">360 U.S. 314</a> (1959) 360 U.S. 314 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ORTEGA v. BIBB, 360 U.S. 314 (1959)

360 U.S. 314

ORTEGA v. BIBB, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 790, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1959.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 360 U.S. 314, 315

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.