FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK, 360 U.S. 251 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK, 360 U.S. 251 (1959)

360 U.S. 251

FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 831.
Decided June 8, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 355 Mich. 103, 94 N. W. 2d 407.

William T. Gossett and L. Homer Surbeck for appellant.

Abraham L. Zwerdling and Harold A. Cranefield for Park et al., appellees.

Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Stanton S. Faville, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for the Attorney General of Michigan, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 360 U.S. 251, 252




U.S. Supreme Court

FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK, 360 U.S. 251 (1959)

360 U.S. 251

FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 831.
Decided June 8, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 355 Mich. 103, 94 N. W. 2d 407.

William T. Gossett and L. Homer Surbeck for appellant.

Abraham L. Zwerdling and Harold A. Cranefield for Park et al., appellees.

Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Stanton S. Faville, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for the Attorney General of Michigan, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 360 U.S. 251, 252

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.