DEVRIES v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO., 359 U.S. 498 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

DEVRIES v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO., 359 U.S. 498 (1959)

359 U.S. 498

DEVRIES ET AL. v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.
No. 551.
Decided May 18, 1959.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 77 S. D. ___, 91 N. W. 2d 663.

Louis Sherman and Joseph M. Stone for petitioners.

Melvin T. Woods for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, p. 236.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons set forth in the concurring opinion in San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, pp. 236, 249.


ANDERSON v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/359/498/case.html">359 U.S. 498</a> (1959) 359 U.S. 498 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ANDERSON v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, 359 U.S. 498 (1959)

359 U.S. 498

ANDERSON ET AL. v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 786.
Decided May 18, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 250 Iowa ___, 93 N. W. 2d 216.

Ernest F. Pence and Roy A. Golden for appellants.

William M. Dallas for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 359 U.S. 498, 499




U.S. Supreme Court

DEVRIES v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO., 359 U.S. 498 (1959)

359 U.S. 498

DEVRIES ET AL. v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.
No. 551.
Decided May 18, 1959.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 77 S. D. ___, 91 N. W. 2d 663.

Louis Sherman and Joseph M. Stone for petitioners.

Melvin T. Woods for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, p. 236.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons set forth in the concurring opinion in San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, pp. 236, 249.


ANDERSON v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/359/498/case.html">359 U.S. 498</a> (1959) 359 U.S. 498 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ANDERSON v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, 359 U.S. 498 (1959)

359 U.S. 498

ANDERSON ET AL. v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 786.
Decided May 18, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 250 Iowa ___, 93 N. W. 2d 216.

Ernest F. Pence and Roy A. Golden for appellants.

William M. Dallas for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 359 U.S. 498, 499

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.