McDANIEL v. THE LISHOLT, 359 U.S. 26 (1959)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
McDANIEL v. THE LISHOLT, 359 U.S. 26 (1959) 359 U.S. 26McDANIEL v. THE LISHOLT ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
OF
APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 424.
Decided March 2, 1959.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded to the District Court for a new trial.
Reported below: 257 F.2d 538.
C. Dickerman Williams for petitioner.
James M. Estabrook and Francis X. Byrn for respondent A/S Lise.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial in light of Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 424.
Decided March 2, 1959.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded to the District Court for a new trial. Reported below: 257 F.2d 538. C. Dickerman Williams for petitioner. James M. Estabrook and Francis X. Byrn for respondent A/S Lise. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial in light of Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625. Page 359 U.S. 26, 27
U.S. Supreme Court
McDANIEL v. THE LISHOLT, 359 U.S. 26 (1959) 359 U.S. 26 McDANIEL v. THE LISHOLT ET AL.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 424.
Decided March 2, 1959.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded to the District Court for a new trial. Reported below: 257 F.2d 538. C. Dickerman Williams for petitioner. James M. Estabrook and Francis X. Byrn for respondent A/S Lise. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial in light of Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625. Page 359 U.S. 26, 27
Search This Case
