McDANIEL v. THE LISHOLT, 359 U.S. 26 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

McDANIEL v. THE LISHOLT, 359 U.S. 26 (1959)

359 U.S. 26

McDANIEL v. THE LISHOLT ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 424.
Decided March 2, 1959.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded to the District Court for a new trial.

Reported below: 257 F.2d 538.

C. Dickerman Williams for petitioner.

James M. Estabrook and Francis X. Byrn for respondent A/S Lise.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial in light of Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625.

Page 359 U.S. 26, 27




U.S. Supreme Court

McDANIEL v. THE LISHOLT, 359 U.S. 26 (1959)

359 U.S. 26

McDANIEL v. THE LISHOLT ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 424.
Decided March 2, 1959.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded to the District Court for a new trial.

Reported below: 257 F.2d 538.

C. Dickerman Williams for petitioner.

James M. Estabrook and Francis X. Byrn for respondent A/S Lise.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial in light of Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625.

Page 359 U.S. 26, 27

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.