TEITELBAUM v. CALIFORNIA, 359 U.S. 206 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court
TEITELBAUM v. CALIFORNIA, 359 U.S. 206 (1959) 359 U.S. 206 TEITELBAUM v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 678.
Decided March 30, 1959.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 163 Cal. App. 2d 184, 329 P.2d 157.
Morris Lavine for appellant.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Herschel T. Elkins, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
TURNER v. KANSAS, 359 U.S. 206 (1959) 359 U.S. 206 TURNER ET AL. v. KANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 688.
Decided March 30, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 183 Kan. 496, 328 P.2d 733.
Marvin E. Lewis for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
TEITELBAUM v. CALIFORNIA, 359 U.S. 206 (1959) 359 U.S. 206 TEITELBAUM v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 678.
Decided March 30, 1959.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 163 Cal. App. 2d 184, 329 P.2d 157.
Morris Lavine for appellant.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Herschel T. Elkins, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
TURNER v. KANSAS, 359 U.S. 206 (1959) 359 U.S. 206 TURNER ET AL. v. KANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 688.
Decided March 30, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 183 Kan. 496, 328 P.2d 733.
Marvin E. Lewis for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 359 U.S. 206, 207
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
