Hotel Employees v. Leedom, 358 U.S. 99 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
Hotel Employees v. Leedom, 358 U.S. 99 (1958)Hotel Employees Local No. 255, Hotel and Restaurant Employees
and Bartenders International Union v. Leedom
No. 21
Argued November 10, 1958
Decided November 24, 1958
358 U.S. 99
Syllabus
Dismissal by the National Labor Relations Board of petitioners' representation petition, on the sole ground of the Board's long established policy of not asserting jurisdiction over the hotel industry as a class, was beyond the Board's power.
101 U.S.App.D.C. 414, 249 F.2d 506, reversed, and case remanded.
U.S. Supreme Court
Hotel Employees v. Leedom, 358 U.S. 99 (1958)Hotel Employees Local No. 255, Hotel and Restaurant Employees
and Bartenders International Union v. Leedom
No. 21
Argued November 10, 1958
Decided November 24, 1958
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Dismissal by the National Labor Relations Board of petitioners' representation petition, on the sole ground of the Board's long established policy of not asserting jurisdiction over the hotel industry as a class, was beyond the Board's power.
101 U.S.App.D.C. 414, 249 F.2d 506, reversed, and case remanded.
PER CURIAM.
We believe that dismissal of the representation petition on the sole ground of the Board's "longstanding policy not to exercise jurisdiction over the hotel industry" as a class, is contrary to the principles expressed in Office Employes v. Labor Board, 353 U. S. 313, 353 U. S. 318-320 (1957). The judgment is therefore reversed, and the case remanded to the Court of Appeals for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.