SEABOARD MACHINERY CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 358 U.S. 932 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

SEABOARD MACHINERY CORP. v. UNITED STATES , 358 U.S. 932 (1959)

358 U.S. 932

SEABOARD MACHINERY CORPORATION, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 544.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 12, 1959

Messrs. Leo L. Foster and Charles M. Trammell, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Mr. Samuel D. Slade, for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Denied.[ Seaboard Machinery Corp. v. United States 358 U.S. 932 (1959) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

SEABOARD MACHINERY CORP. v. UNITED STATES , 358 U.S. 932 (1959)

358 U.S. 932

SEABOARD MACHINERY CORPORATION, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 544.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 12, 1959

Messrs. Leo L. Foster and Charles M. Trammell, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Mr. Samuel D. Slade, for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Denied.[ Seaboard Machinery Corp. v. United States 358 U.S. 932 (1959) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.