UNITED STATES v. HALEY
358 U.S. 644 (1959)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. HALEY, 358 U.S. 644 (1959)

358 U.S. 644

UNITED STATES v. HALEY.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF TEXAS. No. 587.
Decided February 24, 1959.

166 F. Supp. 336, reversed.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, R. L. Farrington, Neil Brooks and Donald A. Campbell for the United States.

William F. Billings, James P. Donovan and Daniel L. O'Connor for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111.

LANDMAN v. MIEDZINSKI, <a href="/cases/federal/us/358/644/case.html">358 U.S. 644</a> (1959) 358 U.S. 644 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LANDMAN v. MIEDZINSKI, 358 U.S. 644 (1959)

358 U.S. 644

LANDMAN ET AL. v. MIEDZINSKI, SHERIFF, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 589.
Decided February 24, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 218 Md. 3, 145 A. 2d 220.

F. Joseph Donohue and Harold C. Faulkner for appellants.

C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, Stedman Prescott, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and James H. Norris, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 358 U.S. 644, 645




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.