FELLOM v. REDEVELOPMENT AGY., CITY & CTY., SAN FRANCISCO, 358 U.S. 56 (1958)
FELLOM ET AL. v. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF U.S. Supreme Court
FELLOM v. REDEVELOPMENT AGY., CITY & CTY., SAN FRANCISCO, 358 U.S. 56 (1958)
358 U.S. 56
SAN FRANCISCO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATEDISTRICT.
No. 323.
Decided October 27, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 157 Cal. App. 2d 243, 320 P.2d 884.
Appellants pro se.
Dion R. Holm and George E. Baglin for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
FELLOM v. REDEVELOPMENT AGY., CITY & CTY., SAN FRANCISCO, 358 U.S. 56 (1958)
358 U.S. 56 FELLOM ET AL. v. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF
SAN FRANCISCO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE
DISTRICT.
No. 323.Decided October 27, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 157 Cal. App. 2d 243, 320 P.2d 884.
Appellants pro se.
Dion R. Holm and George E. Baglin for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 358 U.S. 56, 57
