FELLOM v. REDEVELOPMENT AGY., CITY & CTY., SAN FRANCISCO, 358 U.S. 56 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
FELLOM v. REDEVELOPMENT AGY., CITY & CTY., SAN FRANCISCO, 358 U.S. 56 (1958)
358 U.S. 56 FELLOM ET AL. v. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF
SAN FRANCISCO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE
DISTRICT.
No. 323.Decided October 27, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 157 Cal. App. 2d 243, 320 P.2d 884.
Appellants pro se.
Dion R. Holm and George E. Baglin for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
FELLOM v. REDEVELOPMENT AGY., CITY & CTY., SAN FRANCISCO, 358 U.S. 56 (1958)
358 U.S. 56 FELLOM ET AL. v. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF
SAN FRANCISCO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE
DISTRICT.
No. 323.Decided October 27, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 157 Cal. App. 2d 243, 320 P.2d 884.
Appellants pro se.
Dion R. Holm and George E. Baglin for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 358 U.S. 56, 57
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
