KOVRAK v. GINSBURG, 358 U.S. 52 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
KOVRAK v. GINSBURG, 358 U.S. 52 (1958)
358 U.S. 52 KOVRAK v. GINSBURG ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON
UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF THE LAW.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT. No. 266.
Decided October 20, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 392 Pa. 143, 139 A.2d 889.
Filindo B. Masino and William B. Ball for appellant.
Robert W. Lees for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
KOVRAK v. GINSBURG, 358 U.S. 52 (1958)
358 U.S. 52 KOVRAK v. GINSBURG ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON
UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF THE LAW.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT. No. 266.
Decided October 20, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 392 Pa. 143, 139 A.2d 889.
Filindo B. Masino and William B. Ball for appellant.
Robert W. Lees for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 358 U.S. 52, 53
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.