SHIPPERS' CAR SUPPLY COMM. v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMM'N, 358 U.S. 45 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

SHIPPERS' CAR SUPPLY COMM. v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMM'N, 358 U.S. 45 (1958) 358 U.S. 45

SHIPPERS' CAR SUPPLY COMMITTEE v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 141.
Decided October 13, 1958.

 160 F. Supp. 939, affirmed.

Wm. P. Ellis for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and Carroll T. Prince, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Charles W. Burkett, Jr. and James E. Lyons for the Southern Pacific Co., appellees.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, filed a brief for the State of Oregon, as amicus curiae, urging that probable jurisdiction be noted.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

DYE v. OHIO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/358/45/case.html">358 U.S. 45</a> (1958) 358 U.S. 45 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DYE v. OHIO, 358 U.S. 45 (1958) 358 U.S. 45

DYE v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 151.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 358 U.S. 45, 46

 


U.S. Supreme Court

SHIPPERS' CAR SUPPLY COMM. v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMM'N, 358 U.S. 45 (1958) 358 U.S. 45

SHIPPERS' CAR SUPPLY COMMITTEE v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 141.
Decided October 13, 1958.

 160 F. Supp. 939, affirmed.

Wm. P. Ellis for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and Carroll T. Prince, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Charles W. Burkett, Jr. and James E. Lyons for the Southern Pacific Co., appellees.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, filed a brief for the State of Oregon, as amicus curiae, urging that probable jurisdiction be noted.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

DYE v. OHIO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/358/45/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/358/45/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/358/45/">358 U.S. 45</a></a></a> (1958) 358 U.S. 45 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DYE v. OHIO, 358 U.S. 45 (1958) 358 U.S. 45

DYE v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 151.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 358 U.S. 45, 46

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.