PERMIAN CO. v. RAILROAD COMM'N., 358 U.S. 37 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

PERMIAN CO. v. RAILROAD COMM'N., 358 U.S. 37 (1958)

358 U.S. 37

PERMIAN BASIN PIPELINE CO. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 64.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 302 S. W. 2d 238.

Lawrence I. Shaw, F. Vinson Roach and R. Dean Moorhead for appellant.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and James N. Ludlum, First Assistant Attorney General, for the Railroad Commission of Texas, and Charles L. Black for the Atlantic Refining Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 358 U.S. 37, 38




U.S. Supreme Court

PERMIAN CO. v. RAILROAD COMM'N., 358 U.S. 37 (1958)

358 U.S. 37

PERMIAN BASIN PIPELINE CO. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 64.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 302 S. W. 2d 238.

Lawrence I. Shaw, F. Vinson Roach and R. Dean Moorhead for appellant.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and James N. Ludlum, First Assistant Attorney General, for the Railroad Commission of Texas, and Charles L. Black for the Atlantic Refining Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 358 U.S. 37, 38

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.